Varun Chakravarthy weighs in on controversial no-ball throughout MI vs SRH match | Cricket Information

Ryan Rickelton was given not out because the third umpire discovered that wicketkeeper Heinrich Klaasen had his gloves in entrance of the stumps when the ball made contact with the bat. (Screengrab)

Kolkata Knight Riders (KKR) spinner Varun Chakravarthy has raised questions over a controversial “no-ball” name through the Mumbai Indians vs Sunrisers Hyderabad match on the Wankhede Stadium on Thursday.
Within the seventh over of the match, Mumbai Indians opener Ryan Rickelton was dismissed by leg-spinner Zeeshan Ansari, with Pat Cummins taking a straightforward catch at cowl.
Nonetheless, the drama unfolded when the fourth umpire stopped Rickelton close to the boundary rope, and the supply was known as a no-ball.
The third umpire discovered that wicketkeeper Heinrich Klaasen had his gloves in entrance of the stumps when the ball made contact with the bat. Rickelton acquired a free-hit, however he didn’t capitalize on it.
The third umpire’s choice was not appreciated by Varun Chakravarthy.
“If the keeper’s gloves are available in entrance of the stumps, it needs to be a lifeless ball and a warning to the keeper in order that he does not do this once more!!! Not a no-ball and a free hit!! What did the bowler do? Pondering out loud!! What do you all assume???” he wrote on X.

Nonetheless, Rickelton was dismissed within the subsequent over as Harshal Patel deceived him with a slower supply. He scored 31 off 23 balls.
Mumbai Indians defeated Sunrisers Hyderabad by six wickets with eleven balls to spare.
Who’s that IPL participant?
Earlier, Sunrisers, who had efficiently chased 246 of their earlier match towards Punjab Kings at residence, didn’t get going and ended up with a below-par rating of 162/5.
Sunrisers’ subsequent opponent can be Mumbai once more on April 23 in Hyderabad. Whereas, Mumbai Indians will lock horns with Chennai Tremendous Kings on the Wankhede.