IPL 2025: Starc’s uncommon back-foot no-ball sparks confusion in tremendous over | Cricket Information

NEW DELHI: In a dramatic twist in the course of the Tremendous Over between Rajasthan Royals and Delhi Capitals, Mitchell Starc discovered himself on the heart of a uncommon and little-known rule breach — a back-foot no-ball.
Tasked with defending in a tense Tremendous Over, Starc had already conceded 9 runs from his first 4 deliveries. However simply as he ready to bowl his fifth, the third umpire intervened. After a replay verify, it was confirmed that his fourth supply was unlawful — not for the standard front-foot violation, however as a result of his again foot had touched the return crease.
The rule, usually ignored, is detailed in Regulation 21.5 of the MCC’s Legal guidelines of Cricket. It states that in the course of the supply stride, a bowler’s again foot should land inside and not touching the return crease. Starc, bowling across the wicket to right-hander Riyan Parag, had let his again (left) foot barely clip the road — an computerized no-ball.
Whereas the front-foot rule permits a part of the foot to be behind the popping crease, the back-foot rule is much stricter: contact with the return crease line ends in a no-ball. This legislation is in place to stop bowlers from exploiting excessive angles, which may make umpiring choices tougher.
The consequence? Royals was awarded a free hit and an additional run — a uncommon and irritating name for any bowler. Fortunately for Starc and the Capitals, the choice didn’t value them the match, as they finally got here out on prime.
Nonetheless, the incident sparked debate on-line, highlighting how even seasoned professionals can fall sufferer to cricket’s extra obscure laws — particularly below the stress of a Tremendous Over.